Skip to Content
We have a new look! Have thoughts or questions? Tell us what you think.

Watch, listen & learn from the world’s best UX experts.

The AYCL Blog

Learn about what’s new, what’s coming, and find blasts from the past.

Storytelling That Is Actionable and Accountable   Part of the September 22 UX Virtual Symposium: Storytelling in Design

September 22, 2016
by Adam Churchill

Jeffrey Eisenberg • 2pm ET / 11am PT

50 minutes

We hear a lot about storytelling and the value stories bring to the work that we do. Not the least of which is the power stories hold to communicate strategy and obtain company buy-in, from the boardroom to the stockroom.

Digital teams may deliver great design, excellent personas and buyer journeys.  They may do all the right work. Yet that work may never reach or impact the sales and marketing teams. Successful story narratives crystalize ideas for teams across an organization and can bridge that gap.

In this seminar, Jeffrey will teach us how we can use story not only to breathe life into the personas we create, but also to make our stories more actionable and measurable. He will share a method that offers practical steps to create personas and stories that are quick to develop, deploy, and measure.

Create a Buyer Legend

  • A buyer legend is a story narrative, developed to be both quick to learn and quick to deploy for people of all backgrounds.

Develop personas and do a pre-mortem

  • Murphy’s law will tell us that whatever can go wrong, will go wrong. Anticipate what could go wrong for each of the personas you create. Define the things that might stop your target audience from getting what they want, and plan for them.

Write a story narrative using reverse chronology

  • It’s natural to start stories from the beginning, but it’s more effective to begin with the end-goal in mind. When you start from the goal, the possibilities narrow, the story becomes tighter, and easier to measure.

Whether you are an expert at creating personas or a novice, this simple, hands-on approach to storytelling will help teams create stories that are both powerful and measurable.

(This seminar will be available in the All You Can Learn Library this November.)

Why Jeffrey?

Jeffrey Eisenberg is the CEO of BuyerLegends.com, a conversion-centered customer experience design training company. He co-authored “Waiting For Your Cat to Bark?” and "Call To Action" both Wall Street Journal and New York Times bestselling books. His latest book is “Buyer Legends: The Executive Storyteller’s Guide”. Since 1998 he has trained and advised companies like HP, Google, GE Healthcare, Overstock, NBC Universal, Orvis and Edmunds to implement accountable digital marketing strategies emphasizing optimization of revenue conversion rates for engagements, leads, subscriptions, and sales.

 

Want to know more about all three speakers for our September 22 UX Symposium?  Or want to save your spot? Explore the entire agenda.

Strategic Storytelling   Part of the September 22 UX Virtual Symposium: Storytelling in Design

September 22, 2016
by Adam Churchill

Leah Buley • 1pm ET / 10am PT

50 minutes

When you are passionate about an idea that you feel will improve the quality of the work your organization does, you advocate for change. The challenge is getting peers and internal department heads to embrace your ideas.

Business leaders need more than a project roadmap or a data-heavy slide deck to act on a plan. If you are struggling to represent a strategic priority or an idea, and you are seeking internal buy-in for it, this seminar will show you how to use storytelling to build support for your ideas within your organization.

Leah will use case studies to help us understand the elements of effective internal communications. She’ll show us how to construct powerful, supported stories that motivate organizations to embrace a plan or prioritize a strategy.

Construct compelling narratives

  • Learn how to create context to support the relevance of your ideas
  • Collect evidence-based data
  • Share trade-offs, consequences, and the return on investment

Communicate the heart of the matter

  • Inspire internal groups with a human-centric narrative
  • Discuss resources and what your organization is committed to doing
  • Develop a big-picture vision of how your organization can coordinate around the work

Marketing, design, product, and UX professionals who want to be effective change agents in their organization on behalf of user-centered design will learn how to use storytelling to align internal teams and persuade business leaders to support their ideas.

(This seminar will be available in the All You Can Learn Library this November.)

Why Leah?

Leah Buley is a veteran of the experience design industry, a former Forrester analyst, and the author of the book The User Experience Team of One. Bridging the roles of practitioner and analyst, Leah can help a company evaluate where it stands competitively with respect to design, and then turn around, roll up her sleeves, and help its teams do the hard work.

Leah spent 15 years in the design field as a UX practitioner (though she got her start as an opinionated web developer). Her past work spans agencies, startups, and Fortune 100 companies. Leah writes and speaks regularly at conferences such as SXSW, UX Week and UX London. Her talks and workshops have a reputation for being high-energy, hands on, and just a little bit quirky.

 

Want to know more about all three speakers for our September 22 UX Symposium?  Or want to save your spot?  Explore the entire agenda.

Story First: Crafting Products That Engage   Part of the September 22 UX Virtual Symposium: Storytelling in Design

September 22, 2016
by Adam Churchill

Donna Lichaw • Noon ET / 9am PT

50 minutes

Story is a powerful tool when it is used to communicate how we experience products and services. Stories help teams generate ideas for the products they build and the people who engage with them. If you aren’t getting users to engage with your products in the way that you’ve envisioned, or you are struggling to get buy-in for your products, this seminar will give you the tools you need to captivate and motivate your audience.

When you get right down to it, it seems obvious that stories frame the narrative surrounding the most successful products and services with which we engage. Stories communicate feelings and provide a framework for the way we interact with a product over time. How else do we share the value and purpose of what we are doing, if not through story?

Understand what story does for people and how it functions

  • Learn how story structure governs how we think about products
  • Apply story structure to digital products
  • Craft and communicate simple narratives

Apply narrative architecture to digital products

  • Use narrative architecture to map conceptual models and customer journeys
  • Assess the strengths, weaknesses, gaps, and opportunities in your ideas
  • Envision customers using the things you build

Think and act like a story-maker

  • Recognize stories in the products around you
  • Understand when story contributes to a product’s success, and when it falls short
  • Take a story-first approach to the work you do

Donna will walk us through her method for crafting and communicating simple narratives that captivate people and call them to action. User experience designers, visual and print designers, product managers, developers, marketers, and content strategists alike will learn how a story-first approach can transform a product, feature, landing page, flow, content or product strategy.

(This seminar will be available in the All You Can Learn Library this November.)

Why Donna?

Donna Lichaw brings us over 15 years of experience guiding startups, non-profits, and global brands in optimizing their digital products and services by providing them with a simplified way to drive user engagement through impactful storytelling. As a consultant, speaker, writer, and through her Storymapping Workshop, DonnaI utilizes a ‘story first’ approach to help teams define their value proposition, transform their thinking, and better engage with their core customers. Her book, The User's Journey: Storymapping Products That People Love, is out now and has garnered lots of early praise.

 

Want to know more about all three speakers for our September 22 UX Symposium?  Or want to save your spot? Explore the entire agenda.

Onboarding: Build And Retain Your Audience

September 2, 2016
by Adam Churchill

A common mistake in user onboarding design is an experience that shows complete user engagement with the product right out of the gates. A more successful approach, explains Samuel Hulick, starts where the user starts. In this approach, the onboarding design helps users move incrementally toward their next step, growing and adapting to the experience.

Map your users’ first experience with your product. Imagine what happens in their first sitting. If you use tool tips, don’t throw them at the user all at once. Deliver them one at a time, and make sure they are action-oriented. If you do use tool tips, expect them to be skipped, especially if they are not action-oriented.

People don’t buy products, Samuel explains. They buy better versions of themselves. What is the improvement that your product is providing? And how can you move your users toward that step?


From, “Growing Your User Base with Better Onboarding,” a virtual seminar with Samuel Hulick.

Solve Design And Content Problems With Visual Models

August 26, 2016
by Adam Churchill

Visual models help us get unstuck when we rely too heavily on linear thinking or logic that ties us to certain assumptions or approaches in our problem solving. When we visually conceptualize ideas, we get out of our heads, arrange, interact, and share information in ways we might not otherwise consider.

You might have some hesitation about creating your own visual models, but Stephen Anderson strongly suggests you give it a try. Models help us see patterns in information, and combinations, that reveal new insights.

Many of use charts and diagrams, models and templates to track data or map a user experience—even visual models as simple as a Venn diagram or XY matrix. These are all highly useful methods to help us solve problems and create a new understanding of the work that we do.

Making Your Legacy Media More Accessible

August 12, 2016
by Adam Churchill

You’ve got a website full of uncaptioned videos and images, PDFs that don’t meet ISO standards, and a checklist of other legacy media that has to be “fixed.” On a limited budget. And by yesterday, of course. What’s the best strategy for bringing your legacy media up to date?

Let analytics be your guide, says Whitney Quesenbery, accessibility expert and co-author of The Web For Everyone. Which PDFs are downloaded most often? What are the most popular videos? Find out where users go and what they do.

Once you’ve identified key tasks and content, you can explore any existing barriers and address these systematically. While you’re in the process of updating PDFs, for example, you can give users the option to contact you and request a specific PDF in accessible format. This is another source of “street research” that will help you prioritize your work.

Whitney’s advice? Acknowledge the problem. Communicate that you’re working on a solution. And focus your energy and resources on the things that your users are most likely to need.

Collaborative IA

August 5, 2016
by Adam Churchill

By Abby Covert

This post was originally published on Abby's blog, Abby The IA, on August 5, 2016.

 

Last week I had the pleasure of teaching a new webinar for UIE’s All You Can Learn Library. The video is now available, and with permission from UIE I have decided to share and primary lessons of the talk. 

(You can get Abby's slide deck or read the transcript)

 

Why Collaborative Information Architecture?

I talk to a lot of people about IA. It is one of my favorite things to do. One common theme I run into in these conversations is how to deal with people. It seems that everyone agrees that the main challenge of practicing IA is not deciding where to put things or what to call things, it is doing so in an environment where people have diverse opinions about where to put things and what to call things. After bumping into this reality enough times, I decided to really give it some thought. The result is this:

Too many people are practicing information architecture alone at their desks and presenting the results to their colleagues and clients. As a result, they are struggling to make actionable change, being discouraged by lack of understanding and getting frustrated with not being respected for their expertise.

How to Make Sense of Any Mess, I wrote: “…making maps and diagrams alone at your desk is not practicing information architecture.”

I made this point in passing to get across the idea that dealing with other people’s opinions is part of IA work, not something we get to choose our way out of. Ever since writing this line I have looked to pressure test it and create lessons around how to get other people involved in IA work.

Because in my experience, practicing IA with other people is not only more efficient, it is also more effective.

In preparation for the webinar I sent out a survey asking people a few questions about challenges they face in practicing IA. The result was 79 in-depth responses where people poured their hearts and souls into two simple free text fields.

Here is a recap of the common things I heard:

  • Conversations about language are difficult because people within a single organization are often speaking different languages based on role or area of focus
  • It is common to run into arguments about priority (of audiences, of goals, of resources et al) and for prioritization to be considered through a lens of organizational politics not user centricity
  • People complained about the prevalence of “This is how we have always done it” thinking and how hard it is to get organizations to change
  • Other competencies were reported to ignore or override decisions made by IA or seeing IA as cosmetic and arbitrary
  • Lack of time or budget for collaboration, testing and iteration around IA was often attributed as the largest thing standing in the way of good IA thinking

With all this in mind I set out to create a webinar to help people think about their IA process and look for opportunities to make it more collaborative.

In this 90 minute presentation I cover:

  • How to communicate the value of IA to your organization
  • How to make time/get time for IA
  • How to think about IA in agile vs waterfall environments
  • How to use stakeholder interviews to get people invested in making things clear
  • How to facilitate low fidelity conversations about language
  • How to mine for language across channels and contexts
  • How to use diagrams and drawing exercises to collaborate on IA with others
  • How to get people to actually pay attention to controlled vocabulary work

One of the most valuable parts of the research survey was the “burning IA questions” that people asked — but with all the content I had to share in the webinar, a lot of those great questions ended up on the cutting room floor. Below I would like to answer the top five questions that people submitted that didn’t make it into the talk.

How do you establish trust when you don’t have years of experience?

The best advice I can give you when it comes to building trust is this: listen more than you speak. I find that often times people go through their days aiming to be seen as the smartest person in the room, constantly looking for opportunities to show off their skills or ideas. If you instead spend most of time asking questions and genuinely listening to the answers your clients and colleagues give you, you will be seen as a more trustworthy partner.

The second piece of advice I have for you is to stop having opinions. Well, more like stop weighing in with your opinion. When we talk about IA we are already dealing with many people’s opinions. You want to position yourself as someone who will help to weigh and compare all the opinions that exist so progress can be made, not as someone who will take sides or fight for a certain point of view. Both of these pieces of advice require you to set aside your ego in service of acting as a filter for others. This is a serious challenge to overcome if you want to be trusted in doing IA work, especially without a proven track record.

“When making a cup of coffee, the filter’s job is to get the grit out before a user drinks the coffee. Sensemaking is like removing the grit from the ideas we’re trying to give to users.” excerpt from How to Make Sense of Any Mess

Who within an organization should own the IA?

The simple answer is everyone. I have experienced the IA being owned in technology, marketing, design, product and even most recently by finance… all have resulted in the same issue. Whatever group owns the IA gets its priorities all over it. So instead of deciding who should own the IA, I have started to recommend that my clients create governing bodies for the IA that include cross functional members who come together on a set schedule to discuss IA issues and make IA decisions. By making it so that there is no one group or function that owns the IA it is more likely that decisions will be upheld and questions will be routed appropriately.

Can we practice IA with others without them knowing what IA is?

Yes. Often the best way to talk about IA is to talk about the two concepts within it: language and structure. Both of these concepts tend to make sense to folks across functions and areas of experience. So while educating people on IA can be useful when trying to influence an organization to care about it, it is more 201 level content best taught once the 101 concepts are clear and actionable.

Is it possible to architect something that you don’t understand because it is just too big, too specialized or too complex?

I spent a lot of time thinking about this one. I landed here: No it is not possible to architect something you don’t yet understand. It is the process of understanding it that allows us to shape places in support of it. I have been in many circumstances where the brain-hurt of getting up to speed was hard to stomach. I have lost sleep thinking “this is going to be the mess I can’t make sense of” and yet with time, persistence and bravery I have always been able to break it down and understand it. Here are some tips:

  • Take your time, some things take a while to unravel. Spread the work out and take breaks to think on it. Sometimes our brains need to sit with something passively to have a real breakthrough
  • Visualize it, it is always more complicated when it is kept in our heads alone. These visualizations can be messy and stay messy for a long time while you are working through the mess. Don’t be afraid of unresolved diagrams, they are sometimes needed to resolve larger issues surrounding the diagram
  • Use your naivety as a tool to get people to break down complex things into its parts. I have often asked my clients to describe something as if they were speaking to a grade school classroom.
  • Compare it to something you do know. Find a metaphor or like minded thing in the world that can serve as a bridge between not knowing and knowing

How do you balance the need to continuously educate your co-workers with not getting stale/turning people off with constant preaching?

There is a thin line between educating and preaching. The first tip I have on keeping from turning people off is similar to the advice I gave on question 1. Try listening more and talking less. What would it be like to go into your next meeting and pose everything as a question? Often the person you are trying to educate can tell you what they don’t understand easier than you can educate them on everything you know while hoping something will stick. So after an initial period of proactively introducing some concepts around IA, keep your teaching reactive to what people are struggling with. Also work on your critiquing skills, and make sure your opinions aren’t clouding your judgement. It is common for people to get all hopped up on their own expertise and use their expert voice when voicing their opinions.

Lastly, make sure people know that you know that IA is subjective. There are many ways to do this work. If people understand their role in making good IA choices, they are more likely to feel educated, and not preached at.

I hope you found the presentation and my answers to these questions useful. I am always open to questions from readers, so throw them my way if you have them.

Thanks for reading.

Abby "the IA" Covert is an independent information architect living, teaching and working in New York City.

Design Clinics: The Cure for Lack of Design Cohesion?

August 5, 2016
by Adam Churchill

When you’re a design lead within a large organization, you’re often in charge of groups of designers across different silos. As a design system advocate, you position yourself as a collaborator, someone who’s there to help folks understand the importance of standards, not just point out issues and oversights during a quarterly review.

Nathan Curtis, EightShapes founder and author of Modular Web Design, uses “design clinics” to build collaborative relationships and keep his team faithful to standards and design systems. Once a week, he holds drop-in office hours. Designers and developers stop by to present their work and get advice about how to bring it in line with the corporate brand.

Design clinics are a lightweight, informal way to “triage” glaring discrepancies while fostering a sense of unity and collaboration. They don’t eat up a bunch of hours, but they can have a huge impact on the quality and cohesiveness of your organization’s designs.

Watch Jim Kalbach's Preview: Defining a UX Design Strategy

August 2, 2016
by Adam Churchill

What stategy characteristics lead to concrete elements that will actually work for your team? Jim Kalbach knows how to remove fuzziness from design discussions and inspire consistent action from diverse personalities.

If your strategy discussions feel more like political battles than progressive team-building, this seminar is for you.

Bridging the Gap Between Abstract and Concrete

July 29, 2016
by Adam Churchill

Picture a massive pile of LEGO bricks dumped out on a table. Now imagine those same bricks separated, organized by color or size or function. How much easier is it to build when the components you need are right at hand?

Pattern libraries are a great way to start “sorting the pile,” but they don’t always go far enough.

You don’t really see how these things get used. You don’t see these things in context. You don’t see how these basic LEGO blocks combine together to form the final interface.

With atomic design, you can see how the components fit together—how they interact with each other. You can create consistent, cohesive experiences. And ultimately, you end up with a robust system that the client can use in the future, versus a handful of page templates that only work with the current use case.

Watch Kristina Halvorson's Preview: A Content Strategy Roadmap

July 26, 2016
by Adam Churchill

How to make a website: discover, define, design, develop, deploy. It's a familiar framework for most of our project processes. In this seminar, Kristina Halvorson walks us through a typical website project to demonstrate why, how, where, and when content strategy happens—and how you can do it in your organization, too.

Watch to see what kind of content is useful and usable, and how content already influences your user and business goals.

Avoid Design Disasters with Lean UX

July 22, 2016
by Adam Churchill

Startups come and startups go. But have you ever stopped to think about why they go, why they weren’t successful enough to stick around? The vast majority of projects fail not because people couldn’t build a great product using the latest technology. They failed because we built something nobody wanted.

Lean UX is the perfect disaster-avoidance technique.

  1. You start with one customer—your end user.
  2. You do your research and figure out the number one problem they have with your product or service.
  3. You take a guess at what you could do to solve that problem.
  4. You run your “hypothesis” through the “think, make, check” cycle to see if your guess was right.

If it was, congratulate yourself. If it wasn’t, go back and start over.